pepe
72dd781dbc
Audit every document in the repository, convert the non-markdown ones into markdown reports, and split current documentation from outdated material. docs/ — 31 markdown documents in seven numbered sections. Twenty are new reports generated from .docx / .pdf / .xlsx / .mlx / .m sources that were previously unreadable in the browser and undiffable in git. Each report carries a provenance block (source path, format, MD5) and links back to its original; all 13 recorded checksums verify against the files on disk. Machine-extraction losses (PDF table column interleaving, Word OMML equations, embedded figures) are called out explicitly rather than silently smoothed over. superseded/ — outdated material with a documented reason per entry: two byte-identical ClickUp re-exports, an older revision of the BIDMC/UCSD energy-flow doc (the retained copy adds the SoC Violation Rate KPI), a duplicate of Shift input data.docx, the May 2026 simulation plan, the root PV+Battery.md now covered by a fuller report, GitHub's stock demo-repository template, and a zero-byte placeholder. Its README also records what was deliberately NOT retired and why — the "Old Frameworks" and "Old Simulations" folders hold unique Simulink revisions, and "Big Ugly Folder" holds the only copy of framework revision 1.3. Findings worth flagging, all documented in the reports: - Simulink lineage recovered from each .slx's internal coreProperties.xml revision counter. The current model is Current Framework/Bobert0206_Initial_Simulation_Framework.slx (rev 2.7); the top-level copy is rev 1.3, five revisions behind. - Simulations/Constants.m is a truncated byte-prefix of the Current Framework copy, silently missing H2_leak, H2_cap and E_H2_vol_h. - The PEM electrolyser and fuel cell are unmodified MathWorks Simscape examples still at vendor defaults; the "10x bigger" sizing TODO recorded in Constants.m was never carried out. - controller-claude.m does not compile — undefined P_Electro_max, outputs unassigned on several paths. - The specification set uses two incompatible variable naming conventions and disagrees on action-space size (5 vs 16). - MA_hourly_load.csv (13.7 MB) is the same 35,040 rows as 89993-0.parquet (2.4 MB). - Clinical data is the MIMIC-IV *demo* (ODbL, 100 patients), not full MIMIC-IV — redistributable, but the licence and citation are unrecorded. Housekeeping: untrack 21 Simulink build artefacts (slprj/, *.slxc) and add ignore rules for them. Root README rewritten around the new layout. Recruitment notes naming individual candidates are excluded from version control via .gitignore rather than committed; the generic question template is kept in docs/07-team-and-operations/. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
83 lines
No EOL
3 KiB
Markdown
83 lines
No EOL
3 KiB
Markdown
# MAY MONTH SIMULATION PLANS
|
|
|
|
[Mind Map.pdf](https://t90151962997.p.clickup-attachments.com/t90151962997/2303a3ad-4803-40b7-a6a1-f63bbe14ef0f/comments.pdf)
|
|
|
|
**Team Discussion**
|
|
Task: Wednesday discussion
|
|
Purpose:
|
|
* Discuss current plans.
|
|
* Clarify the next direction.
|
|
* Arrange a working session/evening to align the simulation work.
|
|
**Emails and External Guidance**
|
|
Current status: 3 replies received
|
|
Actions:
|
|
1. Read the assigned paper.
|
|
2. Send emails to arrange a call or meeting. - DONE
|
|
3. Send slides when required.
|
|
Purpose:
|
|
To seek guidance from people with experience in digital twins, microgrids, hybrid energy systems, and simulation-based implementation.
|
|
**Current Status of Simulation Work**
|
|
Component Development:
|
|
* Separate component models are mostly completed.
|
|
* Current progress is around 75% done. - We can move on to next step . 75% ( Grid is not ready thats all)
|
|
**Next Step:**
|
|
The next major step is to combine all separate components into one integrated system-level model.
|
|
Planned Workflow:
|
|
1. Arrange a work session.
|
|
2. Combine all components into one Simulink model.
|
|
3. Test whether the combined model runs correctly.
|
|
4. Data Generation
|
|
→ Main Idea for Simulation Work
|
|
The hydrogen digital twin paper is being used as the main inspiration.
|
|
Core Idea:
|
|
* The paper shows that a digital twin model can be built using component-based models.
|
|
* Based on this idea, our combined components can be used to produce simulated data.
|
|
* The end goal is to generate data from the integrated simulation model.
|
|
Key Point:
|
|
Data production from components is the final goal.
|
|
Proposed Simulation Steps
|
|
**Step 1 — Combine Components**
|
|
Connect all individual models into one complete system.
|
|
Components may include:
|
|
* Solar PV
|
|
* Battery
|
|
* Electrolyzer
|
|
* Hydrogen tank
|
|
* Fuel cell
|
|
* Hospital load
|
|
* Grid - towards the end
|
|
**Step 2 — Define Inputs and Outputs - (Completed)**
|
|
Each component should have clearly defined inputs and outputs.
|
|
Inputs may include:
|
|
* Solar irradiance
|
|
* Hospital load demand
|
|
* Battery state of charge
|
|
* Hydrogen tank level
|
|
* Grid availability
|
|
Outputs may include:
|
|
* PV power
|
|
* Battery power
|
|
* Electrolyzer hydrogen production
|
|
* Hydrogen tank volume
|
|
* Fuel cell power
|
|
* Grid import/export
|
|
* Unserved load
|
|
|
|
**Step 3 — Data Generation**
|
|
Once the combined model runs, use it to generate simulation data.
|
|
Requirement:
|
|
A basic workability check is needed first.
|
|
Check that:
|
|
* All components are connected properly.
|
|
* Signals flow correctly.
|
|
* No unrealistic values occur.
|
|
* The system produces reasonable outputs.
|
|
After basic check:
|
|
The model can be improved and refined.
|
|
|
|
**Research on Hospital Data**
|
|
Hospital data is still under research.
|
|
Current Findings:
|
|
1. A 2025 hospital load / energy audit paper may be useful for Step 3, especially for creating or validating hospital load profiles.
|
|
2. Hospital load website -- that produces data -- its working - but requires looking into it
|
|
3. More data research is still needed and is currently in progress. |